HARM Evaluated

Hospital characteristics and Adverse event Rate Measurement Evaluated
HARM Evaluated logo

Overview

Each year millions of dollars are spent to implementing safety strategies with the intent of improving patient safety. Recent evidence does not support the notion that increased safety efforts have translated into safer hospital care. The objective of HARM Evaluated is to evaluate the effectiveness of safety strategies used in Canadian hospitals. We are presently enrolling 150 hospitals across Canada. The protocol has been published at Published Protocol CMAJ. 

Successful completion will allow effective strategies to be boosted and ineffective strategies to dropped or modified.

Contact us to find out if your hospital is eligible to participate.

Objective

Identify effective safety strategies in Canadian hospitals

Design

National prospective 3-year observational study in 150 hospitals 

Eligible hospitals

≥50 adult acute non-psychiatric inpatient beds & report patient ICD10-CA data to CIHI

Participants

Frontline staff and area Leaders from Medical, Surgical, Obstetric Wards, Operating Rooms and ICUs

Outcome

Patient harm as a consquence of healthcare

Measures

Safety strategies in place in each hospital area, work environment and safety culture, patient casemix

Study partners

The study is powered by partnerships with Health Standards Organization and Healthcare Excellence Canada and funding from Canadian Institutes of Healthcare Research:

Learning as the study progresses

Annual meeting

Open to members from participating hospitals

Live reports for participating hospitals including safety strategies used elsewhere

Study findings

Effective strategies can be boosted and ineffective strategies dropped or modified:

HARM Evaluated materials

  1. Protocol publication
  2. It Is Time for Health Quality 5.0: Are You Ready? :: Longwoods.com
  3. Health Quality 5.0: The Global Health Workforce Crisis – First Thing
  4. Health Quality 5.0: What Does Co-Creation Have to Do With It? :: Longw
  5. Beyond experiential knowledge: a classification of patient knowledge | Social Theory & Health

Related news